Posts Tagged turbo

Quick Test Drive: Subaru BRZ

IMG_0594

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

Finally! Just a couple days ago, I finally, FINALLY, got behind the wheel of one of the 86 twins, the Subaru BRZ. Since the introduction of the Toyota GT86/Scion FR-S and the Subaru BRZ, I have been desperate to actually get a chance to drive one. The reason being that there has not been a small rear drive sports car to generate this much excitement since the Mazda Miata debuted in 1989, or arguably the Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky twins in 2006. It’s no surprise either since it checks all the right boxes: lightweight, rear wheel drive, naturally aspirated four cylinder, two doors, and a reasonable price. The only real differences seem to be two more seats, a solid roof, and a different company. And, as a current Miata owner and enthusiast, I knew that at some point, I had to drive one of these cars, and that day came last week.

Now I need to preface this test drive with the fact that I probably took my first drive of a BRZ in about the worst possible place: Kansas. Nothing against Kansas, but it’s quite flat here, and as a result, there are very few turns. This wouldn’t be much of a problem in something like an old school muscle car that’s built to go fast in a straight line, but that’s not what a BRZ is made for. The BRZ is, like the Miata, a car for turns. With a lack of turns, it was hard to get a really good feel for the car in the handling department, and so there’s only so much I can say about it.

BRZ Rear

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

But before we get to handling and performance, let’s start from the top, or rather, the outside. The BRZ that I test drove was painted Sterling Silver Metallic, and I have to say that it looked quite good. I’ve seen a number of FR-Ss and BRZs in a variety of colors, but I think this was the first BRZ I’ve seen in silver. It’s not a color I probably would’ve considered at first. I probably would’ve leaned toward the BRZ-exclusive WR Blue Mica, but I think the silver won me over. It complemented the distinct curves of the rather short body quite nicely. I think it also improved the look of the front end. The front bumper is one of the few actual distinctions between the BRZ and its twin the FR-S. I’ve typically felt that the FR-S front bumper seems to tie in with the rest of the car better than the BRZ’s, but I think that the high contrast between the black grill and the silver paint really worked well, and has me second guessing myself.

DSC00727

Photo: Joel Stocksdale
(Photo of BRZ interior at Indianapolis Auto Show)

 

Inside the BRZ is a very nice place to be as well. The seating position is nice and low. The dashboard is short and the windshield is upright. The two combined offer a very sporty driving position with good visibility. The seats are quite superb as well. The BRZ I drove was a base model Premium car, with the standard cloth seats. I The bolstering is excellent and overall they’re quite attractive. The BRZ is also slightly better equipped from the start than the FR-S, mainly in the form of a touch screen stereo and navigation system and HID headlights, though the base price comes in at $1000 more than the base price of the FR-S. The higher level BRZ Limited also has a couple other more luxurious features unavailable on the FR-S such as automatic climate control, and heated leather seats with Alcantara inserts. Of course these amenities come at a higher price than the regular BRZ Premium.

DSC00725

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

But let’s face it, the most important part of the BRZ is how it drives. So, how does it drive? In a word: great! Despite a lack of twisty roads, I still could tell that the BRZ could be an all around blast. In fact, it’s the only car I’ve driven that seems to match my Miata. Everything about it is made to make driving fun. The shifter is well placed and has very nice short throws. The pedals are very well placed and feedback from all three is very good. The tachometer is right where it should be, in the middle, and as I already mentioned, the driving position is excellent. The 200hp flat four engine revs smoothly and has nice, progressive, naturally aspirated power delivery, without being too peaky. The gearbox complements it very well with closely spaced ratios that make it easy to stay in the power band. And while I wasn’t driving hard enough to take advantage of it, the BRZ has a standard Torsen limited-slip differential. With that being said, I can understand how people might prefer more power. I recently test drove a Ford Focus ST, and in comparison with the torquey turbo four cylinder in that, the BRZ did feel a tad sluggish. The BRZ is also in need of a little more growl and snarl from the powertrain. It’s simply too quiet and understated for a car as fun as it is. As far as the handling is concerned, from the few corners and highway merging I could muster, it felt excellent. The steering genuinely felt telepathic. Changing lanes took virtually no effort with the car responding to the slightest beck and call from the steering wheel. The car corners quite flat and it felt reasonably grippy, even with the standard tires that the BRZ and FR-S share with the Prius. The steering was also light and easy to work with. I would almost prefer a little more weight, but then I drive a car with no power steering. It’s also worth noting that the ride is good. It’s firm, but absorbs bumps without much fuss.

Overall, I was very impressed. The BRZ and its Toyota siblings are excellent cars. They absolutely deliver on the promise of being fun, affordable, simple cars that really get at the heart at what makes a car really enjoyable to drive. Most amazing to me, was just how close it felt to driving my beloved Miata. It does everything that mine does, but with a little more refinement, quite a bit more power, and in a more practical package. And any shortcomings that these cars may have, are going to be quickly rectified. The aftermarket is already booming for these cars, as I saw in Tokyo this year, and increasing power is one of the first things being addressed. I also expect factory forced induction options to be available soon. Subaru has a turbo four cylinder based on the BRZ engine in the new Forester, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Toyota offered a supercharger kit through TRD like they’ve done in the past on cars like the Scion tC.

My only regret is that I didn’t get to drive this car where I could get a real feel for it’s capabilities in corners. And I doubt the dealer would let me take it to an autocross. But either way, the BRZ is brilliant, and I think Mazda will have to seriously up their game with the next Miata if they want to stay competitive. And if anyone happens to know someone with a BRZ or FR-S that would be willing to let me drive it on a twistier road or an autocross, feel free to let me know. I promise I’ll be gentle.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Quick Test Drive: Fiat 500

Fiat 500

Though this is technically a 500C at the Indy Auto Show, it is similarly colored and equipped, with the exception of the automatic transmission.

Hello readers, I’m taking a pause in my Tokyo posts to finally bring you some test drive impressions of the Fiat 500. I got to test drive one back over Thanksgiving break, and wrote this up a couple weeks after the drive.

I’ve always enjoyed little cars, and was pleased that a couple years ago such a charming and stylish little hatchback got the chance to come to America. Not only that, but it’s the first new, affordable Italian car to make it here since the early 90s, and as a result, the first Italian car I’ve ever driven.

Easily the most striking thing about the Fiat is the exterior. The Fiat 500 manages to one up the cuteness of both the Mini Cooper and VW Beetle. That cuteness may be a bit hard to stomach for the insecure, but for those that are uninhibited by insecurities would be hard pressed to find any vehicle with the same level of style and chicness for the money.

Guage ClusterThe style certainly doesn’t end on the outside either. The interior takes the trendy Italian look even further, particularly with the red and white configuration in the 500 Pop I test drove. A short, body color coordinated dashboard evokes the old cars of the fifties that had plain painted dashboards. However, unlike classic 500s, featureless painted metal gives way to painted plastic bearing airbags and all the modern conveniences you would need. The instrument cluster also gets a big dash of style with the tachometer being nested inside the speedometer so that the tach needle races along the inside track and the speedo needle cruises along the outside track. While a very cool idea, the graphics on the instruments were a bit difficult to make out at first, and other data was in the trip computer in the center. The computer was controlled with a very convenient button on one of the steering stalks that is easier to access than those little buttons buried in the panel behind the steering wheel on other cars.

InteriorFiat 500s come well equipped with standard cruise control, leather steering wheel, steering wheel controls, auxillary USB port, air conditioning, ABS, electronic stability control, and remote keyless entry. All of this for a base price of $16,000 MSRP, which also prices it favorably with subcompact leaders like the Honda Fit (only about $100 separate the two). Though from a practicality standpoint, the 500 doesn’t hold a candle to the Fit considering that the Fit has two more doors and is nearly two feet longer than the diminutive 500.

This is probably a good time to go over a couple of issues that crop up from this small package. First and foremost is that the backseat is nearly useless. With two adults sitting up front in comfortable positions, any rear passenger will find their legs merging with the seats in front of them. And even when the front occupants compromise their space for the sake of the rear passengers, comfort is not a word that would spring to mind. Also, avoid packaging your Fiat with a sunroof and the optional upgraded sound system if you have someone on the passenger side frequently. The sunroof takes away some of the admittedly rather good headroom, and the sound system places an amplifier underneath the passenger seat, raising it up. The end result is a severe headroom crunch for the passenger, as evidenced by my dad who is only about 5’10” and was feeling kind of tight.

Trunk

There’s more space in here if you don’t opt for the Beats Audio sub.

However, it’s not all bad spacewise in the 500. In general, space is quite good. Plenty of headroom (in standard form, no sunroof and no upgraded stereo), elbow room, and leg room. I did find my knee occasionally coming into contact with the center stack near where the shifter is positioned, but pretty good overall. And surprisingly, the 500 does have more cargo space behind the rear seats than the Mini Cooper, another cool small hatchback that has tight rear accommodations as well. The impressive part being that the 500 comes up seven inches shorter than the Mini.

As important as all of this is, the driving experience is where everything needs to come together, and the 500 isn’t too shabby. The compact dimensions make the 500 a piece of cake to maneuver and position. This ease of mobility is reinforced by the superb visibility. Large windows give a great view out, and the very tall riding position lets you take full advantage of it. The high riding position can come as a bit of a surprise as well. For such a small car, you don’t expect to be at eye level of people in large sedans and small crossovers. The combined result makes for a small car that leaves you feeling quite confident darting around town.

Although it is fairly zippy and easy to maneuver, the 500 does come up a little short in the sporty department. The steering was solid and fairly quick, and cornering was fine, but taking it with a little speed up a highway ramp you could feel that it lacked the planted feel of a Mini or a Mazda2. Although the 500 has a sport button, it was a bit hard to tell if it made a difference. It may have been possible to discern a greater difference had we driven on some twisty backroads, but those are in slightly short supply on the north side of Indianapolis. It’s also possible that the Sport model 500 would be more enjoyable in the handling department, but the only one I drove was the base Pop model, which also shares its suspension with the top “luxury” level Lounge model.

Something to relieve those concerned about driving small cars on the highway, the 500 felt quite nice and secure. The ride was nicely composed and the interior was really quite quiet at normal highway speeds. And while the 500 in standard form isn’t going to break any speed records, it does keep up with traffic, even if you may need to downshift to make rapid passes.

Fiat 500 AbarthOverall, the Fiat 500 is a charming and attractive little car. It’s infinitely stylish with a nice interior, plenty of amenities, all for a reasonable price. Not only that, as a city car, it’s quite nice keeping up with traffic adequately and plenty of agility. However, if you’re looking for a sportier experience, you may want to try something else like a Mini or Mazda2, or if you’re completely in love with the 500, give the 500 Sport a try. Or if you have more of a need for speed, you can try out the more expensive, but more powerful, 500 Turbo or 500 Abarth, both cars I’d like to test drive as well. Either way, the Fiat 500 offers a great all around package if you want a stylish, fun, economical subcompact and don’t need to carry too many people or too much stuff.

And this little test drive segues nicely into my next Tokyo post: European cars.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Tokyo Auto Salon 2013: The 86 Extravaganza

A Selection of GT86sOne of my favorite cars released in the past year has been the Toyobaru. And by that I mean the car that is badged three different ways as the Toyota GT86, the Subaru BRZ, and the Scion FR-S. It really is only one car with superficial differences. I’ve read occasionally that there are minor differences in suspension tuning, but for all intents and purposes, they’re all the same car with slight changes to bumpers and lights. Regardless, the important thing is that it’s a lightweight, front-engined, rear wheel drive sports car with a Subaru flat four that uses Toyota’s direct fuel injection technology. And it is a wonderful little car. I still need to drive one myself, but its rave reviews, including being Top Gear’s Car of the Year, it’s fairly safe to say it is a great automobile.

However, after attending Tokyo Auto Salon, I don’t think any country has gotten as excited over what I will here on refer to as the 86 as Japan. Seriously, the 86 was everywhere at the show. There was even a booth called “86 World” dedicated entirely to the car. It was amazing the amount of stuff for the car and for fans of the car. Frankly, 86 World took some of the merchandising to Ferrari-like extremes. Aside from toy cars, you could also see tools, sneakers, and even eyeglasses bearing the 86 logo! It was almost too much. Ignoring the borderline absurd 86-branded goods, there were plenty of really amazing and interesting takes on this great, affordable little sports car.

Among the things that I saw tweaked and changed on the 86, power upgrades were quite common. Many people have griped over the 86 having too little power at just 200hp. And while there is likely to be a factory forced induction car (which has even become more likely that the turbo version of the new Subaru Forester uses a version of the same engine), the aftermarket has you covered if you can’t wait. I saw at least three different ways of adding forced induction to an 86 by adding a turbocharger, a centrifugal supercharger, or even a roots-style supercharger. While I’m sure the first two will likely be the most common and most supported modifications, I couldn’t help but love the roots blower on top of that 2.0 boxer engine. However the roots supercharged 86 wasn’t the most unusual 86 with uprated power. I would say that title goes to the Tom’s GT86 on display in the Gazoo Racing booth. In that particular version, the four cylinder was thrown out altogether to make way for a V6. Unfortunately I don’t know nearly enough about the car or the engine to tell you anymore than that, but I would assume that it was taken from another Toyota product.

Outside of just power mods, there were other interesting 86s as well. In 86 World, Toyota had a version kitted out with retro style goodies like vintage looking wheels, thick-sidewall tires, and even rear window louvres! I also was quite fond of the rally style 86 with fog light pods mounted on either side of the grill. Possibly one of the most popular 86s in 86 World was the life-size Choro Q 86. For those of you unfamiliar, Choro Qs are little toy versions of cars that are made to look cartoon-esque with exaggerated proportions and dimensions. This of course translates to a pretty amusing vehicle when scaled to full size.

Over in the aforementioned Gazoo Racing booth, some of the most extreme versions of the 86 resided. The most publicized of them was the Gazoo Racing designed 86 which was inspired by the last generation of the Toyota Supra. I was a little skeptical when I saw some of the early pictures, but seeing it in person, I feel they pulled it off nicely. You could tell it shared some of the Supra’s design aesthetic, but it was its own car. There was also an 86 modified and painted to look like an old AE86 Levin driven by Keiichi Tsuchiya. This was something rather cool considering that the Option Auto booth had that very AE86 on display as well. The Tom’s V6 GT86 did not ignore style either. It was showcasing some new body work including some very cool carbon fiber fender flares and custom split four spoke wheels. The wheels were shown in black and silver and I assume will be available to consumers soon. The last 86 in the the Gazoo booth was one that received the most radical bodywork short of the Supra inspired 86. It was designed with what I would describe as very classic, European lines. It was very organic and flowing, and I feel that it was quite attractive.

Elsewhere, throughout the show, you would find 86s scattered all over the place. From Top Secret, to Abflug, to Project Mu, it really was an 86 invasion. And you could find them in an array of styles from all function track style to just all style. There was even a kit that could make your 86 look like Toyota’s other, substantially faster and more expensive sports car, the Lexus LFA. The 86 even showed up in miniature customized form, with a USDM style model kit catching my eye. The 86 was almost overwhelming. It was very nice to see though that this small, low cost, rear drive sports car is going to get so much support and attention from the aftermarket. Cars like this simply don’t really exist anymore. The lone torch-bearer left in this segment has been the Mazda Miata, and while I love the Miata, I’m glad to see that there is another amazing little sports car out there. And hopefully if the 86 is as successful as it looks like it will be, we may even see a couple other competitors enter the fray.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments