Quick Test Drive: 2014 Mazda3

The all-new 2014 Mazda3

The all-new 2014 Mazda3

Today’s small car segment is one of the most competitive segments in the industry. In this world of ever increasing demand for better fuel economy, manufacturers have been upping their game and introducing more models all the time. Subcompacts have been a big part of the boom, but the bread and butter small sedans and hatchbacks are still key players, and today, offerings from overseas and the US are competitive and appealing. So, keeping your car current and at the top of its game is imperative.

The Mazda3 was a car that, despite still garnering praise from the press, needed a redesign, and that’s what it got. The 2014 Mazda3 is a ground-up redesign that shares much of its technology with the CX-5 crossover and 6 midsize sedan. It continues the “Kodo” styling language introduced on the CX-5 and 6 with great success. The Mazda6 is still the most elegant application of the look with longer, more graceful curves, but the 3, particularly in hatchback form, is quite attractive and the smaller shape does give it a sportier appearance.

Mazda3 rear three-quarter view

The Mazda3 starts at $16,945 for the i SV and the top end s Grand Touring starts at $25,995. The 3 is available with either a 2.0L or 2.5L engine, each with an impressive 13:1 compression ratio. The 2.0 produces 155 hp and 155 lb-ft of torque, while the 2.5 yields 184 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque.

Disappointingly, the only option for manual transmission users is the lower powered 2.0. Rumors on the web say that a manual should be available with the 2.5 sometime this year, and considering that the same 2.5 is available with a manual in the Mazda6, it would be quite surprising if it never became an option. But, as a result, the Mazda3 I had the privilege of sampling was a 2.0L model.

Mazda3 Interior

The car I drove was rather modestly equipped. It was a Mazda3 i Sport sedan with a cloth interior and steel wheels with covers. It was nearly the base model, but a lower end SV trim is available for less. If you really need to save money, an SV isn’t a bad option, as it still comes with niceties like air conditioning and USB connectivity, but cannot be equipped with cruise control, and oddly enough, doesn’t come with split folding rear seats. Standard features on the Sport included cruise control, air conditioning, USB and Bluetooth connectivity, steering wheel-mounted controls, tilt/telescoping steering wheel, power windows and locks, remote keyless entry, push-button start, and that’s about it. This model came without any extra options.

Center Stack

Inside, the Mazda3 is a fairly nice place to be. Everything is put together nicely, and the doors close with a soft and satisfying thud. The dashboard uses plenty of soft touch plastics, although harder varieties can still be found. What’s worth noting is how understated and simple the interior feels. Certainly there are interiors that are simpler, the current Impreza springs to mind, but in contrast to cars like the Focus, Civic, and Cruze, the 3 has a very basic, unpretentious interior. The controls were also quite intuitive and easy to use. The location of the stereo controls is also an interesting style point. The controls are set up in a little pod, like a small monolith, poking up out of the top of the dashboard. They are easy to read and access, and if your 3 comes with touch-screen audio and navigation, a screen takes its place, resembling an iPad. I’m not sure I’m completely taken by the design, but it’s certainly not unattractive. It will also be interesting to see how one might install an aftermarket stereo. The instrument cluster is also simple and easy to use. I’m not a big fan of the digital tach on the lower models, though. It works well for what it is, but I’d much rather have the center dial dedicated to revs instead of speed.

Simple instrument cluster that would be improved with an analog, center-mounted tachometer.

Simple instrument cluster that would be improved with an analog, center-mounted tachometer.

The interior is certainly on the dark side, with a charcoal cloth, black plastics, and thick pillars.  However, the pleasantly short dash and a windshield that isn’t as steeply raked as many other cars, providing good forward visibility. The one other downside to the Mazda3 is interior space. The front has plenty of room and is easy to find a comfortable position. But the rear seats are a tad short on rear space. I can sit reasonably comfortably behind myself, but legroom is certainly not class-leading. Cargo space also isn’t class leading, but it is still competitive with most other small cars.

One area the Mazda3 has always excelled in is driving, and this generation isn’t any different. Professional reviewers have raved about this generation’s driving aptitude, and although my test drive involved city streets and highways, I have no reason to disagree. The whole car is very responsive. The shifter is positive, easy to use, and has fairly short throws. The steering, while featuring electric power assist, is linear, accurate, and feels good. It is on the light side, and a little more feel could be nice, but very good overall. The car handles with little body roll and turns eagerly.

The engine is also quite eager. I was a little concerned that the 2.0 would feel a bit sluggish, but I found it to be a willing companion in town and going up on-ramps. It’s also worth noting that while the 2.0 is down 29 hp and 35 lb-ft of torque compared with its larger displacement sibling, it also has much less weight to work with when equipped with a manual. A manual Mazda3 2.0 weighs in at 2781 lbs and the automatic Mazda3 2.5 (the only available combination) is 201 pounds heavier at 2982. It also gets one mpg better in the city, and two on the highway (29/41 vs. 28/39). How the two compare in real life I can’t say for sure though, as I only drove the 2.0 today. But, even with the 2.0, the Mazda3 was a very enjoyable little car to drive, and I imagine a manual equipped 2.5 could be even more fun.

As far as small cars go, the Mazda3 is an excellent choice. It’s a very sharp looking little sedan, or hatch if you prefer, that offers an attractive and comfortable interior, and great driving dynamics in an economical package. It’s a little short on space compared with the competition, but if style and fun for little money are your primary goals, you can’t go wrong with a 3.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Quick Test Drive: Subaru BRZ

IMG_0594

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

Finally! Just a couple days ago, I finally, FINALLY, got behind the wheel of one of the 86 twins, the Subaru BRZ. Since the introduction of the Toyota GT86/Scion FR-S and the Subaru BRZ, I have been desperate to actually get a chance to drive one. The reason being that there has not been a small rear drive sports car to generate this much excitement since the Mazda Miata debuted in 1989, or arguably the Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky twins in 2006. It’s no surprise either since it checks all the right boxes: lightweight, rear wheel drive, naturally aspirated four cylinder, two doors, and a reasonable price. The only real differences seem to be two more seats, a solid roof, and a different company. And, as a current Miata owner and enthusiast, I knew that at some point, I had to drive one of these cars, and that day came last week.

Now I need to preface this test drive with the fact that I probably took my first drive of a BRZ in about the worst possible place: Kansas. Nothing against Kansas, but it’s quite flat here, and as a result, there are very few turns. This wouldn’t be much of a problem in something like an old school muscle car that’s built to go fast in a straight line, but that’s not what a BRZ is made for. The BRZ is, like the Miata, a car for turns. With a lack of turns, it was hard to get a really good feel for the car in the handling department, and so there’s only so much I can say about it.

BRZ Rear

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

But before we get to handling and performance, let’s start from the top, or rather, the outside. The BRZ that I test drove was painted Sterling Silver Metallic, and I have to say that it looked quite good. I’ve seen a number of FR-Ss and BRZs in a variety of colors, but I think this was the first BRZ I’ve seen in silver. It’s not a color I probably would’ve considered at first. I probably would’ve leaned toward the BRZ-exclusive WR Blue Mica, but I think the silver won me over. It complemented the distinct curves of the rather short body quite nicely. I think it also improved the look of the front end. The front bumper is one of the few actual distinctions between the BRZ and its twin the FR-S. I’ve typically felt that the FR-S front bumper seems to tie in with the rest of the car better than the BRZ’s, but I think that the high contrast between the black grill and the silver paint really worked well, and has me second guessing myself.

DSC00727

Photo: Joel Stocksdale
(Photo of BRZ interior at Indianapolis Auto Show)

 

Inside the BRZ is a very nice place to be as well. The seating position is nice and low. The dashboard is short and the windshield is upright. The two combined offer a very sporty driving position with good visibility. The seats are quite superb as well. The BRZ I drove was a base model Premium car, with the standard cloth seats. I The bolstering is excellent and overall they’re quite attractive. The BRZ is also slightly better equipped from the start than the FR-S, mainly in the form of a touch screen stereo and navigation system and HID headlights, though the base price comes in at $1000 more than the base price of the FR-S. The higher level BRZ Limited also has a couple other more luxurious features unavailable on the FR-S such as automatic climate control, and heated leather seats with Alcantara inserts. Of course these amenities come at a higher price than the regular BRZ Premium.

DSC00725

Photo: Joel Stocksdale

But let’s face it, the most important part of the BRZ is how it drives. So, how does it drive? In a word: great! Despite a lack of twisty roads, I still could tell that the BRZ could be an all around blast. In fact, it’s the only car I’ve driven that seems to match my Miata. Everything about it is made to make driving fun. The shifter is well placed and has very nice short throws. The pedals are very well placed and feedback from all three is very good. The tachometer is right where it should be, in the middle, and as I already mentioned, the driving position is excellent. The 200hp flat four engine revs smoothly and has nice, progressive, naturally aspirated power delivery, without being too peaky. The gearbox complements it very well with closely spaced ratios that make it easy to stay in the power band. And while I wasn’t driving hard enough to take advantage of it, the BRZ has a standard Torsen limited-slip differential. With that being said, I can understand how people might prefer more power. I recently test drove a Ford Focus ST, and in comparison with the torquey turbo four cylinder in that, the BRZ did feel a tad sluggish. The BRZ is also in need of a little more growl and snarl from the powertrain. It’s simply too quiet and understated for a car as fun as it is. As far as the handling is concerned, from the few corners and highway merging I could muster, it felt excellent. The steering genuinely felt telepathic. Changing lanes took virtually no effort with the car responding to the slightest beck and call from the steering wheel. The car corners quite flat and it felt reasonably grippy, even with the standard tires that the BRZ and FR-S share with the Prius. The steering was also light and easy to work with. I would almost prefer a little more weight, but then I drive a car with no power steering. It’s also worth noting that the ride is good. It’s firm, but absorbs bumps without much fuss.

Overall, I was very impressed. The BRZ and its Toyota siblings are excellent cars. They absolutely deliver on the promise of being fun, affordable, simple cars that really get at the heart at what makes a car really enjoyable to drive. Most amazing to me, was just how close it felt to driving my beloved Miata. It does everything that mine does, but with a little more refinement, quite a bit more power, and in a more practical package. And any shortcomings that these cars may have, are going to be quickly rectified. The aftermarket is already booming for these cars, as I saw in Tokyo this year, and increasing power is one of the first things being addressed. I also expect factory forced induction options to be available soon. Subaru has a turbo four cylinder based on the BRZ engine in the new Forester, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Toyota offered a supercharger kit through TRD like they’ve done in the past on cars like the Scion tC.

My only regret is that I didn’t get to drive this car where I could get a real feel for it’s capabilities in corners. And I doubt the dealer would let me take it to an autocross. But either way, the BRZ is brilliant, and I think Mazda will have to seriously up their game with the next Miata if they want to stay competitive. And if anyone happens to know someone with a BRZ or FR-S that would be willing to let me drive it on a twistier road or an autocross, feel free to let me know. I promise I’ll be gentle.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

I’m Seeing Double!

Unusual automobiles show up in all sorts of shapes and sizes all over the place. However, it still comes as a surprise when an example of automotive uniqueness shows up in your own backyard. But sure enough, that’s what happened in this case.

Craigslist ScreenshotA couple weeks ago, a friend of mine posted a Craigslist ad for a “Pontiac Twin Car.” The preview picture was pretty surprising. The ad was for not one, and not two Pontiacs, but really two halfs of Pontiacs. On one end was the front end of a ’94 Pontiac Grand Am, and on the other end, the front end of a ’00 Pontiac Grand Am. It certainly caught my eye, and apparently the eyes of a few other places, even Jalopnik. Knowing that there was a vehicle this unusual just down the road from my dorm at McPherson College, I decided I had to see this car for myself, and meet the people behind its creation.

100_5873

Eric and his father

So, last Tuesday afternoon, after arranging a time to visit, I drove over to Auto House Collision Repair Center to see the push-me-pull-me Pontiac. I spoke mainly to Eric Unruh who listed the vehicle that he and his dad built. Eric has been working at the shop that his dad started for most of his life, and he and his dad have been working on all variety of vehicles. When Eric was a kid, he and his dad built go-karts, and even turned a John Deere pedal tractor into a powered, pulling tractor. Nowadays, beyond shop vehicles, they have a few racecars they build and take dirt-track racing at Salina Speedway. More specifically, Eric drives both Mod-Lite class cars (like smaller versions of Modified cars using motorcycle engines), and front-wheel-drive compact cars (Preludes, Neons, etc.).

100_5867

It was the connection to Salina Speedway that started their foray into a push-me-pull-me type car. Eric and his father told me that a friend of theirs had the original idea. Their friend does clowning shows at the racetrack, and thought that such a car would be a great addition to the show. So he talked to the Unruhs, and the project began.

The resulting car is quite interesting. It was constructed from two Grand Ams that had suffered damage to the rear. The vehicles were cut apart, and work began to make them into a single unit with a twist: both parts of the vehicle can be separated and driven individually. The two halves were100_5870 constructed with their own roll cages, separate fuel systems, and caster wheels mounted to electric jacks. On the 2000 Grand Am, a latching mechanism is attached to the hand brake lever. When stationary, the electric jacks can be lowered, and the latch released to let the two Pontiacs scamper off in their own directions. Eric and his dad estimated that it took only about two weeks worth of work to get the car into a fully functioning state. And the result is a very entertaining thing to watch, and according to Eric, just as entertaining to drive. (Video link in photo below)

Screen Shot 2013-03-30 at 11.12.25 AM

As a result of the extensive surgery, there are occasional handling quirks. As Eric informed me, losing half of the car makes it very light at the back, and that you want to be easy on the brakes as the back is much more likely to lift up. There also isn’t a way to lock the steering on one end of the car, so it’s best to have two people at the wheel when the halves are together. While this may seem like a minor inconvenience, it has its benefits in that you can drive the car sideways in a straight line, and can corner even tighter than a normal Grand Am!

100_5887Of course you might be wondering, if this car was built for a specific buyer, why are Eric and his father selling it? Well, as it turns out, their friend decided that he wasn’t going to use it for one reason or another, and Eric and his dad couldn’t find any use for it, so it’s been listed on Craigslist. They are currently asking $2200 and I honestly don’t know where else you would find a car like this. And if it helps, the air conditioning still works on at least one of the halves, so if you need to drive your double-sided Pontiac in hot weather, you can still stay cool. As for whether or not there are any other unusual projects in the future, Eric wasn’t sure but he said, “If we find something cool, we’ll build it.” So, if you find yourself in central Kansas needing a push-me-pull-me Pontiac, or have some other automotive project needing work, you know where to go.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

Quick Test Drive: Fiat 500

Fiat 500

Though this is technically a 500C at the Indy Auto Show, it is similarly colored and equipped, with the exception of the automatic transmission.

Hello readers, I’m taking a pause in my Tokyo posts to finally bring you some test drive impressions of the Fiat 500. I got to test drive one back over Thanksgiving break, and wrote this up a couple weeks after the drive.

I’ve always enjoyed little cars, and was pleased that a couple years ago such a charming and stylish little hatchback got the chance to come to America. Not only that, but it’s the first new, affordable Italian car to make it here since the early 90s, and as a result, the first Italian car I’ve ever driven.

Easily the most striking thing about the Fiat is the exterior. The Fiat 500 manages to one up the cuteness of both the Mini Cooper and VW Beetle. That cuteness may be a bit hard to stomach for the insecure, but for those that are uninhibited by insecurities would be hard pressed to find any vehicle with the same level of style and chicness for the money.

Guage ClusterThe style certainly doesn’t end on the outside either. The interior takes the trendy Italian look even further, particularly with the red and white configuration in the 500 Pop I test drove. A short, body color coordinated dashboard evokes the old cars of the fifties that had plain painted dashboards. However, unlike classic 500s, featureless painted metal gives way to painted plastic bearing airbags and all the modern conveniences you would need. The instrument cluster also gets a big dash of style with the tachometer being nested inside the speedometer so that the tach needle races along the inside track and the speedo needle cruises along the outside track. While a very cool idea, the graphics on the instruments were a bit difficult to make out at first, and other data was in the trip computer in the center. The computer was controlled with a very convenient button on one of the steering stalks that is easier to access than those little buttons buried in the panel behind the steering wheel on other cars.

InteriorFiat 500s come well equipped with standard cruise control, leather steering wheel, steering wheel controls, auxillary USB port, air conditioning, ABS, electronic stability control, and remote keyless entry. All of this for a base price of $16,000 MSRP, which also prices it favorably with subcompact leaders like the Honda Fit (only about $100 separate the two). Though from a practicality standpoint, the 500 doesn’t hold a candle to the Fit considering that the Fit has two more doors and is nearly two feet longer than the diminutive 500.

This is probably a good time to go over a couple of issues that crop up from this small package. First and foremost is that the backseat is nearly useless. With two adults sitting up front in comfortable positions, any rear passenger will find their legs merging with the seats in front of them. And even when the front occupants compromise their space for the sake of the rear passengers, comfort is not a word that would spring to mind. Also, avoid packaging your Fiat with a sunroof and the optional upgraded sound system if you have someone on the passenger side frequently. The sunroof takes away some of the admittedly rather good headroom, and the sound system places an amplifier underneath the passenger seat, raising it up. The end result is a severe headroom crunch for the passenger, as evidenced by my dad who is only about 5’10” and was feeling kind of tight.

Trunk

There’s more space in here if you don’t opt for the Beats Audio sub.

However, it’s not all bad spacewise in the 500. In general, space is quite good. Plenty of headroom (in standard form, no sunroof and no upgraded stereo), elbow room, and leg room. I did find my knee occasionally coming into contact with the center stack near where the shifter is positioned, but pretty good overall. And surprisingly, the 500 does have more cargo space behind the rear seats than the Mini Cooper, another cool small hatchback that has tight rear accommodations as well. The impressive part being that the 500 comes up seven inches shorter than the Mini.

As important as all of this is, the driving experience is where everything needs to come together, and the 500 isn’t too shabby. The compact dimensions make the 500 a piece of cake to maneuver and position. This ease of mobility is reinforced by the superb visibility. Large windows give a great view out, and the very tall riding position lets you take full advantage of it. The high riding position can come as a bit of a surprise as well. For such a small car, you don’t expect to be at eye level of people in large sedans and small crossovers. The combined result makes for a small car that leaves you feeling quite confident darting around town.

Although it is fairly zippy and easy to maneuver, the 500 does come up a little short in the sporty department. The steering was solid and fairly quick, and cornering was fine, but taking it with a little speed up a highway ramp you could feel that it lacked the planted feel of a Mini or a Mazda2. Although the 500 has a sport button, it was a bit hard to tell if it made a difference. It may have been possible to discern a greater difference had we driven on some twisty backroads, but those are in slightly short supply on the north side of Indianapolis. It’s also possible that the Sport model 500 would be more enjoyable in the handling department, but the only one I drove was the base Pop model, which also shares its suspension with the top “luxury” level Lounge model.

Something to relieve those concerned about driving small cars on the highway, the 500 felt quite nice and secure. The ride was nicely composed and the interior was really quite quiet at normal highway speeds. And while the 500 in standard form isn’t going to break any speed records, it does keep up with traffic, even if you may need to downshift to make rapid passes.

Fiat 500 AbarthOverall, the Fiat 500 is a charming and attractive little car. It’s infinitely stylish with a nice interior, plenty of amenities, all for a reasonable price. Not only that, as a city car, it’s quite nice keeping up with traffic adequately and plenty of agility. However, if you’re looking for a sportier experience, you may want to try something else like a Mini or Mazda2, or if you’re completely in love with the 500, give the 500 Sport a try. Or if you have more of a need for speed, you can try out the more expensive, but more powerful, 500 Turbo or 500 Abarth, both cars I’d like to test drive as well. Either way, the Fiat 500 offers a great all around package if you want a stylish, fun, economical subcompact and don’t need to carry too many people or too much stuff.

And this little test drive segues nicely into my next Tokyo post: European cars.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Tokyo Auto Salon 2013: The 86 Extravaganza

A Selection of GT86sOne of my favorite cars released in the past year has been the Toyobaru. And by that I mean the car that is badged three different ways as the Toyota GT86, the Subaru BRZ, and the Scion FR-S. It really is only one car with superficial differences. I’ve read occasionally that there are minor differences in suspension tuning, but for all intents and purposes, they’re all the same car with slight changes to bumpers and lights. Regardless, the important thing is that it’s a lightweight, front-engined, rear wheel drive sports car with a Subaru flat four that uses Toyota’s direct fuel injection technology. And it is a wonderful little car. I still need to drive one myself, but its rave reviews, including being Top Gear’s Car of the Year, it’s fairly safe to say it is a great automobile.

However, after attending Tokyo Auto Salon, I don’t think any country has gotten as excited over what I will here on refer to as the 86 as Japan. Seriously, the 86 was everywhere at the show. There was even a booth called “86 World” dedicated entirely to the car. It was amazing the amount of stuff for the car and for fans of the car. Frankly, 86 World took some of the merchandising to Ferrari-like extremes. Aside from toy cars, you could also see tools, sneakers, and even eyeglasses bearing the 86 logo! It was almost too much. Ignoring the borderline absurd 86-branded goods, there were plenty of really amazing and interesting takes on this great, affordable little sports car.

Among the things that I saw tweaked and changed on the 86, power upgrades were quite common. Many people have griped over the 86 having too little power at just 200hp. And while there is likely to be a factory forced induction car (which has even become more likely that the turbo version of the new Subaru Forester uses a version of the same engine), the aftermarket has you covered if you can’t wait. I saw at least three different ways of adding forced induction to an 86 by adding a turbocharger, a centrifugal supercharger, or even a roots-style supercharger. While I’m sure the first two will likely be the most common and most supported modifications, I couldn’t help but love the roots blower on top of that 2.0 boxer engine. However the roots supercharged 86 wasn’t the most unusual 86 with uprated power. I would say that title goes to the Tom’s GT86 on display in the Gazoo Racing booth. In that particular version, the four cylinder was thrown out altogether to make way for a V6. Unfortunately I don’t know nearly enough about the car or the engine to tell you anymore than that, but I would assume that it was taken from another Toyota product.

Outside of just power mods, there were other interesting 86s as well. In 86 World, Toyota had a version kitted out with retro style goodies like vintage looking wheels, thick-sidewall tires, and even rear window louvres! I also was quite fond of the rally style 86 with fog light pods mounted on either side of the grill. Possibly one of the most popular 86s in 86 World was the life-size Choro Q 86. For those of you unfamiliar, Choro Qs are little toy versions of cars that are made to look cartoon-esque with exaggerated proportions and dimensions. This of course translates to a pretty amusing vehicle when scaled to full size.

Over in the aforementioned Gazoo Racing booth, some of the most extreme versions of the 86 resided. The most publicized of them was the Gazoo Racing designed 86 which was inspired by the last generation of the Toyota Supra. I was a little skeptical when I saw some of the early pictures, but seeing it in person, I feel they pulled it off nicely. You could tell it shared some of the Supra’s design aesthetic, but it was its own car. There was also an 86 modified and painted to look like an old AE86 Levin driven by Keiichi Tsuchiya. This was something rather cool considering that the Option Auto booth had that very AE86 on display as well. The Tom’s V6 GT86 did not ignore style either. It was showcasing some new body work including some very cool carbon fiber fender flares and custom split four spoke wheels. The wheels were shown in black and silver and I assume will be available to consumers soon. The last 86 in the the Gazoo booth was one that received the most radical bodywork short of the Supra inspired 86. It was designed with what I would describe as very classic, European lines. It was very organic and flowing, and I feel that it was quite attractive.

Elsewhere, throughout the show, you would find 86s scattered all over the place. From Top Secret, to Abflug, to Project Mu, it really was an 86 invasion. And you could find them in an array of styles from all function track style to just all style. There was even a kit that could make your 86 look like Toyota’s other, substantially faster and more expensive sports car, the Lexus LFA. The 86 even showed up in miniature customized form, with a USDM style model kit catching my eye. The 86 was almost overwhelming. It was very nice to see though that this small, low cost, rear drive sports car is going to get so much support and attention from the aftermarket. Cars like this simply don’t really exist anymore. The lone torch-bearer left in this segment has been the Mazda Miata, and while I love the Miata, I’m glad to see that there is another amazing little sports car out there. And hopefully if the 86 is as successful as it looks like it will be, we may even see a couple other competitors enter the fray.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

Tokyo Auto Salon 2013: Race Cars

The big draw for me at the Tokyo Auto Salon was all the amazingly modified cars that are on display. But those aren’t the only vehicles that show up at show. As it turns out, to my surprise and delight, some pretty cool race cars from the past and present were on display this year. Two of Honda’s 1960’s Formula One cars were on display, one from 1967 at Honda’s booth, and one from 1964 at the NGK booth. What I love about these cars are the elaborate twisting headers sprouting from the rear mounted engine. And speaking of F1 there was also a 1996 Ferrari Formula One car on display.

Super GT cars were also out in force, ranging from Toyota Prius, to Honda CR-Z, to GT-R, and the lamented HSV-010. The HSV was what came of the remains of Honda’s canceled NSX project. The plan was originally to have a V10 mounted up front for the next generation NSX, but economic conditions led Honda to cancel the project. The Super GT HSV was developed from the stillborn NSX. As many of you know, the NSX will return, but instead with a mid-mounted V6 hybrid. I still look forward to the newest interpretation of the NSX, but I still wonder what a front engine V10 NSX would have been like.

Le Mans cars also showed up, and this probably excited me the most. Last year marked a serious return of Japanese cars to the big prototype leagues at Le Mans. Toyota fielded two LMP1 prototype cars, both gasoline hybrids, against Audi’s nearly invincible entries. Although they were not victorious, it was still a big deal to see them on track and being reasonably competitive. One of those Toyota racers was on display this year. Almost more exciting was seeing the DeltaWing (powered by Nissan) race car at the Nissan booth. The DeltaWing is one of the most radical race car designs to come up in many years. It’s design involves a very narrow track up front with a wide section at the back. The idea is that the car is half the weight and half the aerodynamic drag of its competitors, and as a result, only needs half the power and half the fuel of its competitors. It’s proven to hang well with the established racers, but how to classify it has been a major issue, with the car being relegated to experimental classes. The other issue has been completing a race without wrecking. Through no fault of its own, the DeltaWing has had unfortunate incidents where other cars have taken it out of contention. Ironically, at Le Mans 2012, it was taken out by a Toyota. The other Le Mans racer on display was Mazda’s new diesel powered LMP2 car. This car is brand new and marks Mazda’s return to Le Mans this year. Mazda is the only Japanese manufacturer to ever win Le Mans overall, and the only one to do so with a rotary engine. Since Le Mans is generally dominated overall by the LMP1 class, I doubt that we’ll see Mazda take an overall win, it will be interesting to see how it does in the LMP2 class.

And besides all of these, there were race cars of a slightly more stylized persuasion. Inside the show there were a handful of drift cars scattered about, but it was outside that you could see some D1 Grand Prix drifters putting their cars through their paces in a small course marked out in the exhibition area. Each driver had two solo runs, one a warm-up and the other a scored run, and then they ran tandem drift runs. Though I’m sure it wasn’t quite as spectacular as at a full scale race circuit, it was still brilliant to see some pretty impressive car control, and a healthy (unhealthy?) amount of smoke in such a small area.

Also, be sure to check out the videos linked to YouTube down below for a taste of the drifting action at Tokyo Auto Salon:Screen Shot 2013-01-29 at 2.32.26 PM Screen Shot 2013-01-29 at 2.38.53 PM

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Tokyo Auto Salon 2013: Wow!

DSC01536 I love cars, and I love all types of cars, but I do have a personal fondness for imports, and especially modified imports. I have little doubt that growing up with the Fast and Furious movies and games like Need For Speed Underground, and Midnight Club 3: DUB Edition. I’ve had a lot of exposure to modified cars and especially modified imports. As such I’ve always followed coverage from car media outlets about these kinds of cars and some of the biggest shows featuring modified cars.

Two of the big shows that stood out to me over the years have been the SEMA Show in Las Vegas, and the Tokyo Auto Salon in Chiba. Of course both shows had some inherent obstacles for the average person to overcome to see either show in person. SEMA (Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association) is closed to the public so only members of the industry and press can go to the show. Tokyo Auto Salon, although open to the public, has the issue of being very, very far away from central Indiana, so is expensive to go to. However, in a fortunate convergence of events over the past year, I was able to earn enough money, as well as be able to take time off from school in order to go to the Tokyo Auto Salon. And let me tell you, the trip was worth every penny.

DSC01539

The show is at the Makuhari Messe convention center in Chiba and lasts a weekend in January from Friday to Sunday. Friday is reserved for press and people who have purchased special preview tickets, and Saturday and Sunday are open to the public. So I set off Saturday morning for the first public day of the show. Fortunately that day, as well as the next, had quite nice weather. In fact it was right around 50 degrees fahrenheit so I was unencumbered with heavy jackets or coats. Immediately upon stepping off the train and into the main part of the station, I saw signs pointing toward Makuhari Messe. All things being said though, I think I probably could’ve followed the very large crowd to where it was headed and still made it just fine.

DSC00860The main path from the station to the convention center was mostly on an elevated walkway and on the roads below you could see the occasional Japanese sports car: a Nissan Silvia, a Toyota GT86, a Subaru Impreza STi. And as you got closer to the convention center, you could start to hear the sounds of engines echoing behind the building from the demonstration area.

After a short walk through the somewhat drab hallways I entered the first exhibition hall. Before me lay an enormous room covered in cars. Once down the escalator, all that I could think was, where should I start, and where do I go next? So without any sort of plan, I just started off with whatever was right in front of me, and sort of snaked my way through the halls, booth by booth.

DSC01089And good grief was there a lot to see. At first, having not read the map, I thought that it was just going to be one major exhibition hall, maybe one other. However, it turned out that the first exhibition hall was just one of four, and that’s not counting the outside exhibition area. It was unbelievable, not just in size but in the fact that it was only a three day show. And the reality is, it would be absolutely crazy to try and cover everything I saw at Tokyo Auto Salon in one post. So over the next few days, I will be putting up posts that cover highlights and help show what this amazing event was like. So stay tuned!

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Pros and Cons: Old and New Cars

Over the past year or two, I’ve seen many a discussion over the merits of old and new cars. They can sometimes be a little heated, and sometimes not so heated, but it had me thinking about the various highs and horrors of either path to automotive ownership.

Before going any further, I just want to define what I’m considering old and new here. Old will be pretty much anything you buy used from a private seller. This rules out any certified pre-owned stuff, and covers everything from carburetion to fuel-injection, since any era of used car can have issues over the years. New will be anything that comes straight off the lot, never ending up in the hands of anyone else except for dealer test drives.

Photo: http://www.4starsigns.com/

So let’s start off with older cars. The first and most prominent advantage is starting price. This is the big thing that is so attractive to car buyers and is what many used and old car proponents will go to first in a debate whether to buy new or old. Admittedly, it’s a very, VERY strong argument. Ever wanted to be driving a German luxury sedan? You can do so for less than a stripped out Hyundai Accent. Really, the options are near limitless on what kind of car you can get for the money, depending on how old you want to go, and what kind of condition you want. Many a sports car, luxury car, or premium SUV can be had for drastically lower costs than a similar new vehicle if you don’t mind the car being around five years old or so.

So the up front price is really low, is there a catch? Well, there might be. If you’ve ever owned a car or known someone that has owned a car, you know problems do come up. They can be anything from simple wear items like needing new tires or it’s due for a timing belt change, or it can be something more serious or unexpected. Maybe the car was abused and neglected (owner went 20,000 miles between oil changes or something) and there are serious engine problems. Being thorough about your test drive, having the prospective car inspected by a mechanic, and doing anything you can to research potential problems are all things that you can do to help avoid many of these possible problems, but it’s still possible to miss something or have something go wrong that was already fine. For instance, the stereo amplifier in my brother’s Mini Cooper just recently decided to die, rendering any attempt to listen to music hopeless until the amp is replaced, or a boombox is added to the interior.

Photo: http://www.kevingerard.com/1986Porsche928Red.htm

Following up on things that go wrong, if/when something does go wrong, depending on the car and its age, it may be hard to find and/or expensive. That $5k Porsche 928 seemed like an awesome idea right? Yeah, a great idea until you found out the torque tube needed replaced. How does a $2000-$3000 repair bill sound? Now of course this is a somewhat pricey example and some cars don’t carry such high repair bills, but it is something to bear in mind when looking for a car.

There are of course other things like not having the latest in gadgetry (lately I’ve been jealous of iPod integration in newer cars) or not being as quiet or refined, or just being in rough shape all around. Despite all this, an older car can be pretty great.

When you avoid the really bad cars and find yourself just the right car at just the right price, life can be cool. If it’s in good shape, has a good reliability history, and has all the right features without paying through the nose, few things can compare. Plus, saving that money can go to other things that you like or want to do, whether it’s with your car, or other activities.

Moving on to new cars, there are quite a few things that they do have an advantage when compared with used cars, but buying new still isn’t a magic bullet.

One of the big ways new cars are wonderful is that you’re the only one to have used it. Only in the double digit mileage range, a new car has never been in the hands of anyone else except for brief test drives and whoever delivered it. Everything is clean, everything is shiny, and everything works. Not a single thing is wrong with it. It’s a car as perfect as freshly fallen snow. And that new car smell! Although that new car smell is apparently various plastics outgassing into the interior, it smells so incredibly good; intoxicating might be a little too perfect a word….

Photo: www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11071047
And not having anything wrong with the car is pretty great too. Think about it, you would be able to drive off in a car, and the only thing you have to worry about is taking it easy driving it during the break-in period. That’s it. Nothing is going to break, nothing is going to fail, it’s all good. Just cruise and enjoy yourself until your first oil change. Sure there’s the chance that you might hit something and damage something, or there might be a recall for fiery death, but there’s no chance of shoddy repairs or neglectful owners from the past. Just the proper specs and assembly from the factory. And even in the event of some  problems or recalls, there’s a warranty to help out.

So a new car sounds perfect right? Well, no still not perfect. First thing is the up front cost. Unlike a used car, a new car is going to cost you. For $15k, all you’re really going to be able to afford on the new market is a subcompact like a Honda Fit, a Ford Fiesta, a Mazda2, et al. Not that any of those cars are bad mind you, it’s just that they aren’t necessarily… aspirational automobiles. For the same $15k, you could pick up say, a Honda S2000 (9000 rpm redline, rear wheel drive, convertible top, superb handling) and have a much more impressive car.

The warranty isn’t perfect either. It only lasts for so long, and it doesn’t necessarily cover everything that could happen to your car, just certain things. Plus, if you want to go in and modify your car, just know that the nice long warranty you had just packed it’s bags and ran away. Oh and we shouldn’t forget depreciation. The second you sign your papers and leave the lot, you just lost a few grand, and it’s not going to stop.

But, if you’re willing to deal with some of these things, the comfort and reassurance of having a fresh car with no issues can be very nice. Plus having the latest in amenities and refinements mean that you have a very modern and comfortable car to cruise around in.

Basically, with cars, old or new, it’s pick your poison/pleasure. There simply is no magic bullet. You’re going to lose out somewhere, and you’re going to win out somewhere. The important thing here is, you can prioritize, and through these options, you can max out your priorities and minimize your compromise. You’re looking for a sports car on a budget and you don’t mind fixing a few niggles or issues? The used market is ready for you. You need a family hauler with the latest in technology and can’t worry about it breaking down? There’s a slew of new cars waiting for you. Old and new cars are both great, and despite their setbacks, you can rest assured that there’s one (or two, or three, or more) out there for you.

2 Comments

Cars and Car People: Can’t We All Just Get Along?

The car world is one of wide variety and deep passion. It’s a fascinating world, and there’s always something going on somewhere, and it never seems to stop shifting and evolving. It’s one of the things that keeps me interested and curious about the various goings on in this world. The passion runs deep too, sometimes too deep I would venture to say. I’ve noticed that some people tend to get so entrenched in their respective vehicular niche that they are at least indifferent to other car groups, and actively criticize and hate other groups. This is something that needs to change.

Before going any further, I want to say that having a favored niche is perfectly all right and in a number of ways is beneficial to the greater automotive community. Without people focusing on a certain style, region, make, or model of vehicle, we wouldn’t have the passionate and ever changing environment that is needed to keep the culture, the industry, and the excitement alive.

However, there is clear distinction between healthy enthusiasm, and harmful closed-mindedness. The latter is something I see far too much of. I find many people of every automotive background–muscle cars, tuner cars, factory correct vintage cars, and far more–and in every group there are people that can’t seem to accept other styles and cultures as legitimate in their existence. I find restoration guys that cringe at anything modified. I find muscle guys that hate anything foreign or low displacement. I find tuner guys that think domestics can’t do anything other than go in a straight line. It comes from all sides and while a little gentle joking is fine, it all too often is a result of genuine hate for that group’s favorite car or style.

This really is a shame. The automotive is too big, too varied, too exciting to restrict oneself to one area of the automobile. I personally have a fondness for tuner cars and imports, but that doesn’t mean that’s the only thing I’m interested in. I love seeing exotics, pre-war cars, muscle cars, heck I even get a kick out of bad cars like Yugos. It’s all great to see. I feel that people that can’t appreciate other types of cars are missing out on so much!

And for the skeptics, appreciate doesn’t mean that you like it. There’s a reason that there are so many kinds of cars out there. It’s because there are so many different people with different tastes, but none is less legitimate than the other, or done with less passion and love.

To appreciate the work, the passion, and the strengths of different people and automobiles is something that is so important to enjoying cars to their fullest. It’s also important in building the enthusiast community. If we can learn to appreciate and accept the diversity the automotive world has, the stronger we will be. It will be more welcoming for the new people, friendlier and more accepting of those already in it, and more enjoyable for everyone.

There are simply too many reasons why learning to enjoy a wider array of cars not do so. For the sake of ourselves and the hobby we all love, let’s put aside our prejudices and embrace the diversity the car world has to offer.

This lack of respect isn’t really that of individual to individual, it’s a lack of respect to all the niche groups and variations on the car hobby that exist in this world. People on the outside might not realize this, but “car guy” is a really broad term. When you break down the automotive world, you discover that there are probably hundreds, maybe thousands, of different car cultures all within the vehicular globe. You have people that are interested in specific makes, models, styles, regions, the list goes on.

These groups are often fairly tight-knit, even when they span across the country through online forums. They usually take time to help each other in fixing problems, finding parts, and just spending time with each other or participating in car related events. But these specific groups rarely spend much time with each other, and can sometimes borderline hate people of different car scenes.

It is at this point that I should say that everyone naturally has their own likes and dislikes of different scenes, and the occasional, playful bantering between traditionally opposite ideas on cars. I will readily admit that my personal preferences have always been toward Japanese imports, often modified, and an example of something that I’m not crazy about would be donks. I and some of my friends also have some playful banter back and forth about our preferred cars. This is all fine, and can even be fun when not taken too far. But what I’m talking about is the stereotyping, ignorance, and disrespect shown to car culture that people don’t care for.

Being a modified import guy on a campus that consists of primarily domestic people and beyond factory perfect vintage automobiles puts me in a very small minority. And I have heard no shortage of disrespectful things said about Japanese cars and modified cars. Broadening the genre a little further, and modified cars get plenty of disrespect as well. It’s understandable that a place that is focused on restoration will not be terribly excited about modifying cars, but modification shouldn’t be viewed as evil or disrespectful to automobiles and automobile culture.

Some people might say, “Well, if you don’t like the stuff that is focused on and is the majority, you should go somewhere else.” I’ve actually heard something similar to this before. But here’s the thing, I have nothing against proper restoration, old cars, or domestic cars. I like them too! Why can’t there be at least some acknowledgement that modified, Japanese, and other auto cultures are legitimate and interesting too?

I also don’t want anyone to take this as targeting the vintage restoration crowd. I know plenty of people from my preferred car fanbases that also don’t have a lot of respect for others. I know that it’s a long running rivalry between import and domestic people that rarely sees any mixing or respect. And that’s silly too. Cars of all regions, eras, and levels of modification are all great and they all deserve recognition. No group is any better or worse than another.

I want to see a world where you can have a pristine Bugatti Type 57 parked next to a twin-turbo 20b RX-7, a rat rod with a Cummins diesel, a 70s Monte Carlo jacked up on 30″ wheels, a new Lamborghini Aventador, a murdered out Escalade, a bosozoku Corolla TE72, and many, many, many more. And then, all the owners of all of those cars would be interested in everything that showed up.

You see, the car world is too big, too varied, and too exciting to limit oneself to one area of cardom. By no means should one avoid specializing, if it weren’t for specialists we wouldn’t have such fascinating cars. But get out there and see what else there is. Lowriders, tuner cars, muscle cars, hot rods, rat rods, trail trucks, and more all are brilliant and all are done with the same passion for the automobile that everyone has. Even if you don’t like something, take the time to at least appreciate the unique piece that that person created and loves as much as the things you like.

2 Comments

A Couple of Reflections and Musings

Hey everyone, sorry for the long hiatus again in publishing. I have a somewhat more focused and lengthier post in the pipeline that should be up soon, but in the meantime, I just wanted to share some of my thoughts that have accumulated over the past week and after test driving two new cars: the Subaru Impreza, and the Mazda2. Full disclosure, both vehicles I was impressed with, even though that might not come across clearly for one of them.

No, they’re not competitors, but oh well. (Photos: Edmunds)

First up: gauges. Specifically, this is about gauges that are useful and disappearing, and gauges that are not useful and cropping up more. The Impreza actually represents both of these recent trends.

Look out! Useless gauge in the lower right! (Photo: Subaru)

Let’s start positive. What this instrument panel does have going for it is that it is very simple and easy to read. It is a bit odd that the information display in the middle lights up in a sort of ice-blue color while the dials light up red, it nevertheless is easy to read. It has what seem to be all the normal gauges, but with the gas gauge in the info display. But what’s this? There’s a funny little +/- gauge with the letters M-P-G next to it. What does it do?

As it so happens, the MPG gauge is about the most useless and gimmicky gauge I’ve ever seen in a car. Basically, when the needle points to the plus, it means you’re getting good mileage and when it points to the minus, you’re getting bad mileage. And since there are no numbers to accompany those signs, all it is is an extremely rough estimate of mileage. As I watched it bounce back and forth during the test drive, it seemed to more effectively say how hard I pushed on the gas pedal. More throttle and the needle goes to minus. Less throttle, the needle goes to plus. And I don’t know, but I think most people can glean this information from how close their foot is to the firewall.

Hmm… Simple, but seems to missing something… (Photo: The Car Connection)

Now that we’ve gotten past the addition of a useless gauge, let’s get to the matter of the lack of a useful gauge. Both the Impreza and the Mazda2 seem to be missing a gauge that, to my recollection, was a pretty standard feature. Nowadays, the temperature gauge has disappeared in favor of an indicator light that simply goes off when the engine reaches normal operating temperature. While this probably makes sense in that the average driver probably never looks at a temperature gauge, and modern cars don’t overheat too often, it still seems to be a nice thing to have.

Moving on to my next main point: cheap doesn’t have to be miserable. I’ll be perfectly honest, the Mazda2 doesn’t seem to offer a lot on the surface. The interior is pretty basic, not many infotainment options, and it lacks premium materials. It only makes 100hp, and less than 100 lb-ft of torque. If you want an automatic, it only has four speeds. It sounds like a 1990s economy car. And that’s not a compliment.

No, I wasn’t driving this 2. It sometimes felt like it though. (Photo: Car & Driver)

With that in mind, the Mazda2 has no business being as brilliantly fun as it is. As it turns out, the spartan interior and features list hides a car that has it’s priorities right where a serious driver wants them.

While it’s down on power, the 2 has enormous strength in handling, steering, and shifting. Through a twisty road, I experienced how excellent it all felt together. The 2 holds the road very nicely and corners with little body roll. The steering is quick, precise, and well weighted. The shifter has that satisfyingly flick-able feel. In fact, it felt a little like a Miata or Mini. It’s very small size also made it easy to take tight roads with the utmost confidence.

I feel like there are a lot of cars that could take a lesson or two from the 2. A focus on driving quality over gadgetry would be the top one. I know it’s a losing battle these days, but I still think that there’s a real need to make cars that are enjoyable to drive as opposed to tech-laden transportation boxes. I don’t have much against technology, I would argue that it has made cars better in many ways, but when I would take a Mazda2 over something like a fully loaded Camry, that has to tell you that there’s more to cars than having the most equipment.

Anyway, I think this post running long for one that wasn’t supposed to go too long. And once again, I apologize for the long delays in posts. If nothing else, this summer should result in substantially more, and I know I’ll get at least one more out before then. Thanks everyone!

Leave a comment